Kristine Durkin

Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior
Image
Kristine Durkin
Biography

Kristine M. Durkin, PhD, is an Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Human Behavior (Research) at Brown University and a Research Scientist at Hasbro Children's Hospital and Rhode Island Hospital. She is a pediatric psychologist whose research focuses on improving adolescent health and well-being through community-engaged research, youth participatory action research (YPAR), and implementation science.

Dr. Durkin's work centers on developing equitable partnerships with adolescents and community organizations to ensure that youth perspectives shape research, intervention development, and decision-making. Through long-standing collaborations with Providence youth and community organizations, she has developed a model for engaging adolescents as co-researchers throughout all phases of the research process, including identifying research priorities, designing studies, collecting and interpreting data, creating intervention content, and disseminating findings to community and policy audiences.

She currently serves as Principal Investigator of an NHLBI K23 Career Development Award (K23HL168806) focused on developing and implementing a community-engaged intervention to promote healthy nutrition and physical activity among adolescents in Providence, Rhode Island. Across this work, adolescents play active leadership roles in co-designing intervention content, implementation strategies, and dissemination activities. Her research seeks not only to improve health behaviors and outcomes, but also to increase opportunities for meaningful youth participation in decisions that affect their lives.

In addition to her community-based research, Dr. Durkin has extensive experience working with children and adolescents living with chronic health conditions, including cystic fibrosis, asthma, and diabetes. Across her research, teaching, and mentorship, she is committed to advancing rigorous, actionable scholarship that bridges research, practice, and community priorities while elevating youth expertise and leadership.

Publication Type

Linking Institutions and Neighborhoods for Knowledge in Medicine (LINK-Med): A Unifying Framework in Medical Education Pathway Program Development

2026

Access to medical education remains disproportionately limited for students from low-income households and groups underrepresented in medicine (URiM). Although many pipeline programs exist, no unifying, reproducible framework guides their development, implementation, or evaluation. To address this, the Linking Institutions and Neighborhoods for Knowledge in Medicine (LINK-Med) framework was developed as a four-phase stepwise model for building partnerships between medical schools, clinical institutions, and K–12 educational systems. LINK-Med was applied at Brown University during the 2023–2024 academic year through the Clinical Mentorship Program (CMP), a student-led initiative providing longitudinal mentorship and clinical exposure to high school students in Woonsocket, Rhode Island. The program enrolled 27 high school students and was implemented using existing institutional resources without dedicated external funding. Application of LINK-Med enabled rapid partnership development and programming across a full academic year. Detailed program evaluation findings are reported separately. Future work will focus on expanding LINK-Med across additional sites, developing standardized evaluation instruments, and assessing long-term outcomes for participating students. LINK-Med offers a scalable, low-cost model for increasing access to early medical education. While pathway programs are increasingly recognized as essential for expanding access to medicine, yet institutions lack a blueprint for creating them. LINK-Med introduces a novel implementation framework and geographic feasibility metric that help medical schools build sustainable partnerships with hospitals and local schools. This scalable model transforms successful local initiatives into a reproducible approach for broader adoption.

Suggested Citation:

Suggested citation

Hunt VM, Sprehe LK, Cheng J, et al. Linking Institutions and Neighborhoods for Knowledge in Medicine (LINK-Med): a unifying framework in medical education pathway program development. Research Square. Published July 28, 2026. Preprint. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10474761/v1.

Share

Publication Type

The Clinical Mentorship Program: a mixed-methods evaluation of a community-based medical education pathway program for high school students

2026

Students from low-income and underrepresented backgrounds face structural barriers to entering medicine, including limited access to early clinical exposure, physician guidance, and professional networks. To address these disparities, medical students at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University created a year-long Clinical Mentorship Program (CMP) for high school students in Woonsocket, Rhode Island. The intervention combined monthly after-school instruction on basic science content and clinical skills by medical students with structured hospital-based shadowing and guided discussion with resident physicians. Using a mixed-methods pre-post design, the intervention evaluated changes in educational motivation, clinical self-efficacy, medical knowledge, awareness of other academic enrichment programs, and physician access and comfort. High school students demonstrated significant gains in motivation to attend college, understanding of cardiopulmonary anatomy and physiology, understanding of physician roles, comfort interacting with physicians, self-reported physician access, and awareness of local educational opportunities. Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of experiential learning, guided shadowing, a clearer understanding of medical careers, and persistent structural barriers. These findings suggest that community-based programs that leverage local resources, networks, and infrastructure to combine medical education with guided clinical exposure may be feasible entry points into the medical pipeline for students confronting complex socioeconomic disadvantages.

Suggested Citation:

Suggested citation

Hunt VM, Cheng J, de Lomba WC, et al. The Clinical Mentorship Program: a mixed-methods evaluation of a community-based medical education pathway program for high school students. BMC Med Educ. 2026. doi:10.1186/s12909-026-09852-x.

Share

Publication Type

What the AI era doctor should know: a scoping review of proposed artificial intelligence competencies for medical education

2026

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping healthcare and the competencies expected of graduating medical students, yet AI curricula and competency recommendations for undergraduate medical education (UME) remain fragmented. We conducted a PRISMA-ScR scoping review to map and synthesize proposed AI competencies for UME by performing a global search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ERIC without language restrictions and from database inception through July 28, 2025. Verbatim competency-relevant text was extracted and decomposed into discrete statements and classified using domains, competencies, or learning objectives. Statement frequencies were summarized to characterize recurring areas of emphasis, underrepresented topics, and cross-domain relationships. Of 4071 records identified, 54 studies from 22 countries met inclusion criteria. From 564 eligible statements, we synthesized a taxonomy comprising seven domains (AI ethics; AI law and regulation; AI professionalism in healthcare; clinical applications of AI; critical appraisal of AI output; research and innovation in AI; theory and foundations of AI) spanning 37 competencies and 170 learning objectives. Sources were predominantly editorial/opinion, with recurring emphasis on ethicolegal oversight, critical appraisal of AI outputs, and foundational understanding of AI methods and data. This synthesis provides a structured inventory to inform curriculum planning and future stakeholder-based refinement, prioritization, and evaluation.

Suggested Citation:

Suggested citation

Hunt VM, Sprehe LK, de Lomba WC, et al. What the AI era doctor should know: a scoping review of proposed artificial intelligence competencies for medical education. NPJ Digit Med. 2026. doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02761-9.

Share

The Effects of School Phone Bans: National Evidence from Lockable Pouches

Date & Time
-

Brian Jacob is the Walter H. Annenberg Professor of Education Policy and Professor of Economics at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan, where he serves as the Associate Dean for Research and Policy Engagement. He is a current faculty director of the Youth Policy Lab, the founding director of the Education Policy Initiative, and a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. His research focuses on the economics of education, with work spanning early childhood education to college. Brian's work is motivated by the desire to identify policies with the ability to improve outcomes for all children and increase economic mobility for young people from disadvantaged backgrounds.

 

Watch the recording:

Share

Children’s emerging scientific reasoning in learning environments: A (Education Policy Workshop) approach.

Date & Time
-

Annenberg’s Education Workshop Seminar Series is an hour-long “works in progress” seminar centered on empirical research related to education and education policy. Seminars are typical academic presentations intended for a broad academic audience. Speakers come from a variety of disciplinary traditions and we seek to be inclusive to a broad, multi-disciplinary audience.

We invite faculty, postdocs, students, and research staff from across the university who are interested in empirical research in education to participate.

Share

Senior Research Associate (Educational Measurement)

About Brown

Brown University is a leading research university distinct for its student-centered learning and deep sense of purpose. Our students, faculty and staff are driven by the idea that their work will have an impact in the world.

Brown University offers a flexible work/life balance; summer hours, winter break and a comprehensive Benefits package including time off, annual paid holidays; benefits offerings including health, dental, vision, tuition assistance, retirement, wellness, employee discounts and more.  To learn about Brown University’s benefits, visit the University Human Resources web page for further information.

About the Annenberg Institute

The Annenberg Institute is Brown University’s education research institute. Our vibrant community includes Brown University faculty, postdoctoral research associates, staff, students, and multiple partners in Rhode Island and across the US. We partner with education leaders and global scholars to connect people, evidence, and practices to build toward a more effective and equitable education system that enables all students to thrive academically and in other ways. Our knowledge initiatives catalyze conversations across the research landscape, synthesizing what we know and mobilizing practitioners, policymakers, and researchers toward collaborative impact.

About the Opportunity

The Senior Research Associate will support a body of work related to shared measures of teacher professional learning and growth as part of the Annenberg Institute’s Research Partnership for Professional Learning (RPPL) research team, led by Annenberg faculty John Papay and Nathaniel Schwartz. RPPL is a partnership that brings together professional learning (PL) organizations, district and state education systems, and researchers from the Annenberg Institute to strengthen how the field learns about and improves teacher professional learning. RPPL’s central goal is to rethink how we learn about teacher PL, shifting from studies that explore whether a specific program works to a broader learning agenda designed to identify how PL design features and the enabling conditions of PL improve teachers’ instructional practice and, as a result, students’ classroom experiences, well-being, and academic growth. RPPL focuses on supporting the learning of teachers who work with students from historically marginalized groups.

 

The incumbent will need to have a strong understanding of educational measurement, particularly the practical use of measures, to support a large body of work supporting organizations and school districts in developing shared measures to support organizational learning. They must also have the ability to describe measurement processes and procedures; conduct statistical analyses and validation studies; lead instrument/survey design and development; state intended interpretations and uses of survey response data and expertise in creating and using measures in robust and practical ways. Psychometric expertise is a benefit but not required.

Responsibilities:

Reporting directly to the Principal Investigators, the Senior Research Associate helps develop and lead key research analysis projects, driving all aspects of project planning for multiple research projects for this research team in a dynamic, layered team setting. The position takes a lead role in designing studies, leads data collection and analysis efforts, develops project models, engages practitioners and PL organizations as partners in research work, and writes academic papers, reports, presentations, and grant reports.

Qualifications:

Education and Experience

  • Master’s degree in related field (PhD or EdD preferred) with 5-7 years of research experience or the equivalent combination of education and experience.

  • Ability to work independently or as a member of a team.

  • Experience working on large-scale research studies.

  • A strong quantitative background.

  • Strong background in education research.

  • Psychometric expertise is a plus but not required.

Competencies

  • Strong analytical and writing skills.

  • Training and expertise in utilizing quantitative research methods, including experience working with complex data sets.

  • Strong interpersonal and communication skills.

  • Ability to describe measurement processes and procedures; conduct statistical analyses and validation studies; lead instrument/survey design and development; and state intended interpretations and uses of survey response data.

  • Strong ability to explain methods to research staff and provide guidance on models and interpretation of output.

  • Experience reviewing code and ensuring data best practices are being followed by the research team.

  • Experience distilling and translating substantive takeaways from analyses to policy/practitioner audience.

Additional Information:

This position is 100% grant funded and is for one year with the possibility of renewal, based on satisfactory work performance and dependent upon funding

Please include a resume as one attached .pdf document, 2 writing samples as one attached .pdf document, and the cover letter, transcript, and letters of recommendation or names of references (3) as another single .pdf document (for a total of three attachments).

Background and education check required.

Please reach out to samuel_madison@brown.edu with any questions.

Equity in Context: Institutional Agency in Targeting Student Supports in Massachusetts Community Colleges

2026

How do related, but independent community colleges operationalize and implement an equity-oriented initiative? In 2021, Massachusetts established the SUCCESS initiative to provide nonfinancial student supports in all 15 of the state's public community colleges. This paper draws on 35 interviews with program staff across the colleges to ask how they used their institutional data and designed new data collections to (1) select a focal population for their SUCCESS program and (2) apply their criteria to identify a specific cohort. While we find variation in what the colleges viewed as their most urgent equity gaps, we find that in all colleges, data availability informed how practitioners could identify their focal students. Our findings illustrate how diverse community colleges within one state respond differently to the same equity-oriented initiative; they operationalize equity in different ways that are related to their institutional priorities and data availability.

Suggested Citation:

Suggested citation

Bryer, E., Nurshatayeva, A., & Page, L. C. (2026). Equity in context: Institutional agency in targeting student supports in Massachusetts community colleges. New Directions for Community Colleges. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.70073

Share