Investing in Teachers, Investing in Teaching: The Role of Philanthropy and State Policy

Date & Time
-

Teaching faces a workforce crisis — and two very different levers for addressing it. Pam Grossman, former dean of Penn’s Graduate School of Education and chair of the Spencer Foundation board, examines what philanthropy and state policy can each do for the profession.

Pam Grossman is Professor of Education Emerita and former dean of the Graduate School of Education at the University of Pennsylvania . A distinguished scholar, she came to Penn from Stanford University’s School of Education, where she was the Nomellini-Olivier Professor of Education and the founding director of the Center to Support Excellence in Teaching. Dr. Grossman’s research focuses on teacher education and the teaching profession more generally. Her recent work examines practice-based teacher education and the role of core practices of teaching in teacher preparation and professional development, and she is currently engaged in studying the role of state policy in supporting career trajectories for teachers. She has authored or edited six books including her most recent co-edited book, Core Practices for Teacher Education: A Global Perspective (Harvard Education Press, 2024). Grossman is an elected Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and of the American Educational Research Association, and member of the National Academy of Education and served as Chair of the Board for the Spencer Foundation.

Share

◆
Short Features

Recording Available – The Effects of School Phone Bans: National Evidence from Lockable Pouches

<span class=Recording Available – The Effects of School Phone Bans: National Evidence from Lockable Pouches " class="news_header_image_default" />

The inaugural lecture in our fall Education Policy Seminar Series took place this past week, featuring Brian Jacob’s presentation, “The Effects of School Phone Bans: National Evidence from Lockable Pouches.”

Jacob, the Walter H. Annenberg Professor of Education Policy and Professor of Public Policy, Economics, and Education at the University of Michigan’s Ford School of Public Policy, shared timely research on the effects of school phone bans as schools across the country implement new policies to limit student phone use.

During the lecture, Jacob provided an overview of his research using national evidence from schools implementing lockable phone pouches, examining what the research shows about the effects of phone bans on student behavior and other student outcomes.

Watch the lecture to learn more about the research and its implications for schools and students.

 

Share

What happens in schools and communities when national, state, and local agencies restrict teaching about race and LGBTQ+ related issues?

Date & Time
-

What is the impact in states with restrictive legislation and beyond? How should the education field respond? 

Join us for a provocative conversation with Dr. Mica Pollock, who will share findings from two of her major studies on these issues.

Mica Pollock is Professor of Education Studies at the University of California, San Diego. She is the award-winning author of multiple books on race and education, including: Colormute: Race Talk Dilemmas in an American School, Schooltalk: Rethinking What We Say About—and To—Students Every Day, Everyday Antiracism: Getting Real About Race in School, and Because of Race: How Americans Debate Harm and Opportunity in Our Schools. Pollock previously taught high school in California and worked in the civil rights field. She spent a decade as a professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and received her Ph.D. from Stanford University.

Watch the recording:

Share

◆
Publication Type

Staying on Track

Insights into Algebra 1 Course-Taking Policies in Rhode Island

2026

The Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) requires all students, starting with the graduating class of 2028, to complete a four-credit math sequence, including one advanced mathematics course. To stay on track for graduation, students need to pass Algebra 1 by 9th grade.

As this policy is implemented, some local educational agencies (LEAs) across the state are adjusting their math enrollment policies to ensure timely Algebra 1 success for all students. Success in Algebra 1 directly relates to success in advanced math coursework in high school and enrollment in higher education.2 However, nationally, Algebra 1 is one of the most challenging courses for 9th grade students to pass. Many districts and states are beginning to shift Algebra 1 to 8th grade. This gives students more time to pass and enables more advanced math course-taking. Indeed, early 8th-grade Algebra 1 enrollment is linked to higher advanced math achievement, which increases the likelihood of four-year college enrollment and better long-term socioeconomic outcomes.

We examine 8th grade Algebra 1 enrollment trends in Rhode Island. We draw on data from districts participating in Annenberg’s Professional Learning Network, which brings together district leaders to support instructional improvement efforts in math education across Rhode Island. Through our partnership with the Rhode Island School Superintendents Association (RISSA), we also leverage responses from the 2025–2026 Rhode Island District Leader Survey. This year’s survey asks LEAs to describe their current enrollment processes, changes they are making as a result of the new policy, and barriers to reaching district-wide math goals as the first cohort of high school students are exposed to the more rigorous math graduation requirements. The survey, a joint venture between the Rhode Island School Superintendents Association and the Annenberg Institute, captured 43 responses, 30 from traditional public school districts and 13 from charter LEAs. The LEAs that responded to this survey represent over 90% of all traditional and charter public school enrollments in the state.

Suggested Citation:

Suggested citation

Tuttle, T., Santelli, F. A., & Santos, B. (2026). Staying on track: Insights into Algebra 1 course-taking policies in Rhode Island. Evidence in Action - RI, Annenberg Institute at Brown University.

Share

Seungyeon Jung

Doctoral Student Affiliate
Image
Seungyeon Jung
Biography

Her research examines how institutional policies reshape educational environments, and how families across class positions respond to those changes. Beyond a policy's effect itself, she asks whom it was built for: which groups it reaches, which it quietly passes over, and how those differences accumulate into segregation across schools and neighborhoods. Her broader aim is to explain why reforms designed with good intentions produce uneven results, and to identify the design choices that determine who benefits. She approaches these questions with large-scale administrative data and quantitative methods for causal inference. Her current project examines how charter school entry and closure reshape public school district expenditures, and what those shifts mean for the students who remain in traditional public schools.

Before coming to Brown, she earned her bachelor's and master's degrees in sociology in South Korea. In her free time, she likes to grab coffee, read books, and play tennis.

Tech Boom or Bust? The Effect of Data Center Expansion on Student Achievement with Samantha Kane

Date & Time
-

Annenberg’s Education Policy Workshop Seminar Series is an hour-long “works in progress” seminar centered on empirical research related to education and education policy. Seminars are typical academic presentations intended for a broad academic audience. Speakers come from a variety of disciplinary traditions and we seek to be inclusive to a broad, multi-disciplinary audience.

We invite faculty, postdocs, graduate students, and research staff from across the university who are interested in empirical research in education to participate.

Event speaker: Samantha Kane 

Event Title: Tech Boom or Bust? The Effect of Data Center Expansion on Student Achievement with Samantha Kane 

Share